Marriage & Texas Teens - "We Will Violate Their Civil Rights" Mon, 07 Apr 2008 14:33:04 -0500 "We are not going to violate their civil rights until we have an outcry, a complaint, and I've said that from day one." Schleicher County Sheriff David Doran Another way to read Doran's statement is this: "After we have an outcry, a complaint: WE WILL VIOLATE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS." The likelihood that a child will be abused while in [Texas] foster care is greater than if they were left where they are. (Bolton, Laner, and Gai, 1981; Pryor, 1991; Spencer and Knudsen, 1992.)1 For the government to remove five hundred and thirty four American (534) citizens in Texas from their homes and put them into the care of homosexuals, fornicators, adulteresses, and worse -- teens with STDs is; well, you tell me what it is. When historians look back at the draconian measures taken against non-Muslims practicing polygamy versus the absolutely blind eye that is turned to Muslims practicing polygamy, and practicing it in nearly every neighborhood in the nation, they will wonder how ours could have ever been called a "Christian" nation. Exodus 23:1&2 Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness. Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil; (stealing children) neither shalt thou speak in a cause to decline after many to wrest judgment. (trial by the media) Our streets are littered with the broken lives of teen prostitutes who may be abused one thousand times with impunity while teens who gave themselves to their one and only husband in purity are locked up. Their crime? Their husband failed to get a government consent form signed and notarized and then presented to a judge, despite the fact that their parents gave their full and complete approval for the marriage. Of course the parents gave their approval, they're part of that same community! Before proceeding, we must address one issue which has inflamed the discussion of polygamy, so-called "underage girls" marrying fifty (50) year old men. The first cue that such phrases are spoken by stupid people is the redundancy of "underage girls." The second is that underage is a government definition and has nothing to do with biology. According to the most simple logic, a girl is a girl until her first menstruation. After her first menstruation she is biologically a woman. Furthermore, it has been a long standing legal precedent that by the age of thirteen an individual has reached the age of reason where they will be held responsible for their deliberate actions. Pull out your homeowners insurance policy and you will find a statement very similar to this. "We will not pay for injuries or damages that are caused intentionally, UNLESS, the injury or damage is caused by a child 12 years of age or younger." So we have two definitions, one of them biological and the other psychological which put the age of thirteen as the age at which a female is capable both biologically and psychologically of giving consent. The Apostle Paul says, "I will, therefore, that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully." 1Timothy 5:14 And again Paul says, "She shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety. 1Timothy 2:15 Saved from what? -- saved from a life of fornication so that the adversary (Satan or anyone else who opposes righteousness) may not have any reason to attack the virtue of the young women. The Greek word translated as "younger women" is "neos" which means recently come into being, young, youthful, new and in the context of marriage Paul is speaking of women who have recently become women. Ah, so Paul himself says that women should marry shortly after their first menstrual cycle which was also in accord with the Roman requirement that upon reaching puberty every citizen must marry.2 Need I remind you that it's America's current five year gap between biologically becoming a woman and legally becoming a woman (The Marriage Gap) that sets in motion the pattern of fornication from which few American women ever escape? Even then, they escape only by doing what Paul instructed them to do in the first place, by marrying. Click Here to see a PDF of a typical insurance policy. Search for "Voluntary Payments" after you have the Insurance Policy in your browser. Another aspect of the current mob mentality concerning young women marrying fifty (50) year old men is that the public just cannot believe that a thirteen year old woman would be interested in a fifty year old man. Have they never heard of Mick Jagger, he's sixty five years old and man is he UUUGLY! Yet he still has teens swooning over him. The fact is, in the enclosed society of the FLDS, the fifty (50) year old men are the MOST attractive men to their young women. They strut their little industrial complex with a charisma that politicians would envy. Their families are large and happy. They're famous teachers in their community. They are fearless in the face of mainstream society, willing to risk prison for their beliefs. These men are not just desirable to the young women in their society, they're what our mainstream whores would call HOT. (A whore is a woman who has lost her virginity willingly without wedlock.) But here is the issue that EVERY person who claims they are a Christian MUST deal with. The Bible defines marriage. If these women were given to their husbands by their fathers as wives then they indeed are wives and anyone who encourages them to be with another man is guilty of causing them to become adulteresses for they can only be released to marry another man by their husband with his giving them a Bill of Divorcement. If you are one of the mob running to encourage them to forsake their first husband and take another man then you are an accomplice to adultery. Jesus was very strict concerning marriage and He lived in an age where the average woman married at thirteen. At the time of Jesus, the Roman law, referred to as the Lex Papia Poppaea,2 decreed punishments such as the loss of inheritance rights for women who remained single after having attained puberty. Jesus never criticized that law which commanded that a woman old enough to bear children get married. Why would he? That law prevented pre-marital sex. So when Jesus made his pronouncements on marriage those words applied to all marriages, including those with thirteen year old women. Here is what Jesus said, "But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causes her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is so divorced commits adultery." Matthew 5:32 The same goes for you; if you cause a woman to be put away from her husband then you also are causing her to commit adultery. This is not a social issue. This is a theological issue and this is an issue of the right of religious groups to separate themselves from fornicators such as nearly every American reading this is. Still another hysteria inducing fact is that the Eldorado polygamists had a room in their temple for consummating marriages. For those of you who are so brainwashed by the Roman Catholic marriage ceremonies that today's Protestants gleefully imitate, every typical marriage in the Bible involves the guardian giving the bride and the groom taking her to his tent. What in the world do you think the implication is of what happens in the tent! Duh, what in the world is marriage? Are you dense or something? Marriage involves a willing giving of the bride and a consummation of that marriage. Without the consummation it is not a marriage even according to government law. The Bridal Canopy3 is a remnant of the Bridal Tent3 which was used by the Jews in times past. This Bridal Canopy3 is used in Jewish marriage ceremonies till this day. If you're going to attack the Eldorado group for having what amounts to a Bridal Tent3 then just remember that your attack is anti-Semitic in its roots. For those of you who think that the anti-polygamy hysteria is some new thing, please note that anti-polygamy laws have their roots in anti-Semitism and the two Semite groups that have been the brunt of this bigotry are the descendants of Abraham -- Jacob (the Jews), and Ishmael (today's Muslims). Both have a long record of regulated polygamy and both have been the butt of bigoted jokes and worse. It is hate, and hate alone that fuels this group think against polygamy. One thousand years ago Rabbenu Gershom declared that polygamy would be forbidden to Jews in Christian nations. Why did he do this? Well you guess. We see among us five hundred and thirty four American citizens ripped from their homes because of anti-polygamy hatred. If it were not hate that drives this anti-polygamy hysteria then the subject could be discussed openly and without bigoted jokes, accusations, and outright lies. To understand the hatred, let me give you an example. Let's say that you and your family chose to live in a neighborhood of five hundred plus like minded Christians and you were all practicing monogamists. Let's say that there was one sixteen year old teenager among you who called the police and said that one of the people in the neighborhood had sex with her after a private marriage ceremony when she was fifteen years old and that her parents knew about it and had approved of it but that they had not obtained a judge's waiver for their daughter to get married at that age. Do you think it would be fair for the government to come into your neighborhood and arrest (that's what it is no matter what else you claim) to arrest, more than five hundred of your neighbors, fellow Americans, yes, AMERICAN citizens, in the largest group arrest in the country in years? Do you think it would be right to take the children of your neighbors who had nothing to do with the fifteen year old's marriage and place those children, all virgins, among some of the most notorious teens of the country? It is a fact that many of the teens in foster care have been placed there because of their own delinquency. Is it right for virgins who have never left their household to be placed among such teens? I have cried over this. If you haven't, may God have mercy on your soul. If you say, "but they were taken out of the homes of polygamists," that's exactly my point. Your hatred for polygamists is so great that you think it's perfectly ok to rip people out of their homes, for what? For being polygamists just like so many Old Testament saints as well as many in the New Testament? Don't you realize that many of Paul's contemporaries were polygamist Christians? If that was not the case then why would Paul have exempted men who were not the "husband of one wife" from the thankless job of Elder, Bishop, and Deacon? He exempted the polygamists because they were being fruitful and multiplying in compliance with God's command and fulfilling that duty was enough to exempt them from unwanted tasks that were to be assigned by Timothy and the other apostles. If the selection was to be only those who were "husbands of one wife" then surely there were enough men with more than one wife that Paul thought it necessary to make such an exemption from troublesome lower offices within the church. Yes, Elder, Bishop, and Deacon were not high offices or they would have been called of God, not appointed by man. Click here to read my article entitled: "The Key to Understanding The Husband of One Wife." Now, back to Texas. Isn't it Texas where the governor assumes that teen girls are so promiscuous that he wants to force them to take anti-std immunizations? So the government bans teen marriage, a godly outlet for young women who choose marriage, yet the government not only permits but encourages them to fornicate? Not only does the government encourage their fornicating but they make it legal for them to fornicate with boys who have no ability to support them but make it illegal for stable bread winners to court them and marry them, even when the parents and the girls have given their consent as part of their system of stated community values. What? This has got to be the craziest system man has ever invented; to reward women who have sex with the boys who are least able to support them and penalize those who choose to marry men! BREAKING NEWS--- Obama State Delegate for Colorado, Rozita Swinton, is the same Rozita Swinton who was arrested for calling in the hoax that triggered the Eldorado raid against peaceful American citizens. Article continues below as originally written on April 7, 2008. The quite probably non-existent girl4 who started the Eldorado hysteria is quoted as saying, "Church members told her that if she leaves the ranch, outsiders will ... force her to cut her hair, (TRUE) to wear make up (TRUE) and [different] clothes (TRUE) and to have sex with lots of men. (TRUE)" What is it that is not true about the alleged victim's statement concerning American culture and the environment of foster care today? Everything that this probably non-existent victim was told about the outside world was true. Who is the abuser in this situation? The fact is that American women think it is better to have sex with lots of men before settling on one. Don't you tell me anything different, you fake! Were you a virgin on your wedding night? Look at the actual behavior of people if you want to understand a culture, don't look at what the people in a culture say. We call that baloney. They're full of baloney, spelled BS. Any anthropologist with training knows this. You can go into a country where they say cannibalism is evil but if they're eating their neighbor's liver, don't believe them! When Americans say they believe in waiting till marriage for their first sex, don't believe them. Over ninety percent of Americans have pre-marital sex.5 Face it, we live in a country that says one thing about sex and does another. Forty-five percent of the country says fornication is evil but they fornicate anyway and forty-five percent of the country says fornication is good and they practice what they preach, at least concerning fornication. Now we find America in a situation where its filthy fornicators find a culture within theirs that says and does what it preaches and the fornicators send in armed government officials to arrest and detain five hundred and thirty four fellow American citizens in the most blatant violation of civil rights this country has seen in over fifty years. The pundits are afraid to discuss the issue in a clear and rational way because of the irrational hysteria generated in America by the mere mention of polygamy. Cowards! America's taboo against polygamy has few rivals in the modern world. Americans are willing to suspend the constitution when it comes to polygamists but wait, it's white polygamists who are really the focus of their hatred. "They got our white women in there! They better let lose of 'em or we'll string em up? What white man would do such a thing as have more than one wife! It's plain uncivilized." I can hear them now, their mouths frothing as they hold up their pitch forks... oh yes, it's 9mm weapons they use today. As for the five hundred and thirty- four innocent American citizen detainees in Texas, they remain jailed. What else do you call it when you are held against your own will? To quote a man who I was personally introduced to as a paid staffer on his campaign in 1980; "Government isn't the solution to our problem, government is the problem." Nearly every blessed mother in the Bible was a teen bride, usually married within a year or two of her first menstruation. Throughout history the average age of a princess has been between thirteen and eighteen and the same has been true for the common man. Men who break the law when they could have simply gotten a government license to marry their young bride are foolish but they are not brutes. Teen marriage license infractions, for that is all the Texas case concerns, are now being used to prosecute polygamists since prosecutors know that the next polygamy prosecution will be struck down by the Supreme Court. According to Texas law the only thing that stands between a woman under the age of sixteen (16) and her man receiving a marriage license is a court order. Take a look at the statute for yourselves. Texas Marriage License Requirements It is of note that only after the FLDS moved to Eldorado, were Texas marriage laws changed to discriminate against them, raising the age without a court order to marry from fourteen to sixteen. Prior to the 2005 law being passed a woman age fourteen or older could marry simply by producing a properly executed parental consent form. No court order was required. The requirement of a court order was pass by the Texas legislature for the specific purpose of discriminating against the FLDS so that such court orders could be issued for marriage license requests made by any citizens of Texas EXCEPT unless that citizen were a member of the FLDS. If men who marry teen brides are brutes then so was President James Monroe who married his seventeen year old bride, Elizabeth Kortright as well as President Andrew Johnson who married his then sixteen or seventeen year old bride, Elizabeth McCardle. Neither did Monroe nor Johnson lift so much as one finger to get a license for their marriages. In fact, the marriage dates of the Presidents before the mid-eighteen hundreds are hard to determine since marriage licenses were not required in most localities. The declaration of the man and woman that they were husband and wife was deemed sufficient. Many states still give an exemption to marriage license requirements to Quakers. If men who marry cousins are brutes then Democrat President Martin Van Buren must also be a brute for he married his first cousin, Hannah Hoes. First cousin marriage which is a marriage that is permitted by the Bible is also the butt of anti-Semitic jokes. If men who marry women who are much younger than they are then President John Tyler must also be a brute for he married the beautiful, Julia Gardiner, who was thirty years younger than he was. Likewise, Grover Cleveland, at the age of forty nine, married Frances Folsom who was just twenty-two years old. June/December marriages are also a favorite topic of jokes by bigots who want to put their noses into the business of other peoples' marriages. This bigotry usually contains slanders against those who might marry their cousins like Jacob did, or who might marry a woman much younger, like Jacob did, or who might marry a woman who was under the age of eighteen, like Jacob did. The fact is, such marriages tend only to come to the attention of the public when they are done by polygamists or when they are done by members of religious groups that condemn fornication and homosexuality. The public considers it vulgar when a monogamist marries his cousin, a teen, or someone much younger but the public considers it evil when a polygamist or religious fanatic does the same. Must I bring up the fact that it was King David, the polygamist, who still had enough time with all his wives to write the beautiful Psalms. Do you forget that King Solomon still had time to write the godly and perfect Proverbs and the Song of Songs? Yes, it is a fact that the most poetic and beautiful love poem in the Bible was written by Solomon, the world's most famous polygamist. Furthermore, this King Solomon, wrote Ecclesiastes which was taken by a Sixties band for its melodic words -"To everything - turn, turn, turn There is a season - turn, turn, turn And a time for every purpose under heaven." Well, it is the season to start recognizing that in a marriage, a man is joined to each of his wives by God, not by man. This is what many of our presidents recognized. Those of you who do not trust God to join you in marriage need our prayers. I don't expect my fellow Americans to agree with me. My fellow Americans refuse to hang the pornographers from the lamp posts along side the CEOs of the major hotel chains in America who pipe in pornography to their hotel rooms. Americans would prefer that one polygamist be sent to prison than one hundred million fornicators be told that sex outside of marriage is a sin but let me put you on notice. The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, yes, Jesus Himself, is going to judge you and that day is not far away and He will punish you. Repent. He will punish you for forbidding what the Bible permits and for causing grief and suffering with your backwards and primitive, yes primitive and barbaric laws. For you reward young women with your welfare state who have sex with boys that cannot support them and you punish the wise virgins who choose marriage with an older stable man. 1 Timothy 4:3 1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; 2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; 3 Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth. SEND THIS ARTICLE TO A FRIEND! CLICK HERE! [1] The Welfare of Children by Duncan Lindsay - Published 2003 [2] Lex Papia Poppaea, A.D. 9, sometimes known as Jus Trium Liberorum granted special privileges to men with many children and punished celibacy by limiting the rights of single men. This can account for Paul's discussions on celibacy which should not be taken as encouraging celibacy but as defending the right of a man or woman to voluntarily choose marriage instead of feeling compelled to marry by government decree. The Lex Papia Poppaea decreed punishments such as the loss of inheritance rights for those who remained single after having attained puberty up to the age of fifty for women and sixty for men. A man or woman was given one hundred days to get married upon finding out they were the beneficiary of an inheritance or forfeit the inheritance. There are many more interesting details of this Roman law which I'll address in another article. [3] Bridal Tent - "They pitched the tent, the bridal tent, of the Semites, which has survived in the canopy of the Jewish wedding ceremony to our own day." The International Critical Commentary - A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on The Books of Samuel by Henry Preserved Smith - Professor of Biblical History and Interpretation in Amherst College Published in 1902 [4] Rozita Swinton has been arrested and is currently being investigated for pretending to be a sixteen (16) year old woman; that same "sixteen year old 'girl'" who was the alibi for the Texas Jack Booted Thugs' raid on a peaceful neighborhood in Eldorado to steal over four hundred (400) children from their parents and place them with fornicators, homosexuals, and adulteresses. Rozita E Swinton is also listed on the El Paso County Colorado Democrats website as being a State Delegate from Precinct 269. I called the El Paso County Colorado Democrat Headquarters and spoke with Carol, the woman who answered the telephone, and when I asked her whether that Rozita Swinton who is listed on their website as a state delegate for Obama is the same Rozita Swinton who was arrested for being the polygamy hoax caller she said, yes. As he that bindeth a stone in a sling, so [is] he that giveth honour to a fool. Solomon -- Proverbs 26:8 The Texas CPS and Jack Booted Authorities gave honor to a fool, now the ammunition that they intended to fire at their opponents is blowing up in their faces! [5] Trends in Premarital Sex in the United States, 1954'-2003 Lawrence B. Finer, PhD
Martin Madan - A Memory of Love [Chapter 12] Mon, 05 Feb 2007 22:33:10 -0600 This excerpt is from The Prince of Sumba, Husband to Many Wives.Copyright 1998 Don Milton All Rights Reserved.All Copyright Laws Apply - Thou Shalt Not StealChapters: [Prologue] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] Chapter 12 - Martin Madan - A Memory of Love Ruth's genius was revealed through her method of Bible study but now she opened up to expose the tenderest of hearts. She set aside her notes, as her voice softened and she delivered a long overdue eulogy for the now forgotten Reverend Martin Madan. "You remember how Sam said that there's a long list of eminent theologians who've been forgotten simply because they supported polygamy?" "Yes, I remember." Suni answered, "I was wondering who those might be." "Well Suni, the Reverend Martin Madan, the Father of the Evangelical Hymnal, was a well known preacher of the eighteenth century and the most talented Church music composer of all time.22 He wrote a book called: 'Thelyphthora; Or, a Treatise on Female Ruin, Its Causes, Effects, Consequences, Prevention, and Remedy.' Part of the remedy that Madan proposed was polygamy.23 He put forth in his book that the ban on polygamy that was originally put in force by the Roman Catholic popes had been the cause of widespread prostitution and fornication. He roundly criticized the banning of taking more than one wife, an activity that Jesus used in metaphor without criticism." Cherry recalled the parable of the Ten Virgins, "Yes, Ruth, Jesus praised the five brides who kept plenty of oil in their lamps while they waited for their polygamous husband."24 "That's a great example, Cherry. Now can any of you tell me what song the following line comes from? 'With th' Angelic Hosts proclaim, Christ is born in Bethlehem!'" "Are you telling us that the Reverend Martin Madan wrote Hark the Herald Angels Sing?" Suni asked. "No, Suni, that was primarily written by Charles Wesley, but in 1760, Martin Madan did introduce those two lines and they have been kept in the hymn as we sing it still today."25 "So he was apparently a well accepted and much beloved Christian of his time to have known Charles Wesley." Asina observed. "That's right. Not only did he know Charles but he was godfather to Charles' son, Samuel and he was also a friend of Charles' brother, John Wesley, the famous evangelist who founded the Methodist denomination.26 Madan even comforted the dying composer Handel, famous for his masterpiece; The Messiah.27 I think it's clear that up to the moment that he published Thelyphthora, in 1780, that he was well respected. In 1746, thirty four years before he wrote that book, he founded the London Lock Hospital. London Lock was the first voluntary hospital that treated venereal disease.28 It was during his ministerial duties there that he gained a great deal of first hand knowledge about the consequences of fornication and prostitution. Shortly after Madan's arrival, the institution opened a new building and it became known as 'The Female Hospital.' He built a chapel associated with the hospital which could seat up to eight hundred people.29 This may not seem large compared with today's mega-churches but it's still a very large fellowship and it was one of the largest of his day. His chapel received enough tithes to become a strong source of support for the hospital.30 It was there that the singing of hymns first took hold as part of Christian worship in England.31 The members sang from a hymnal that Madan, himself, had published. He published the hymnal as a benefit to future generations as well as to raise money for the hospital.32 From the Chapel at the Lock, Hymn singing spread quickly through the English speaking world with Madan's hymnal the standard. His mastery of musical worship brought thousands to the Chapel at the Lock and his hymns have brought many more thousands to a saving knowledge of our Lord.32 In less than thirty short years from the first printing of Madan's hymnal, fully two thirds of the hymns sung, even in the parishes of the Church of England, had been arranged by Madan himself for his hymnal had become the core of the Church of England's hymnal.33 The Baptist's hymnal came out twenty five years after Madan's.34 Here is the very hymnal that Madan published. My father let me take the original from his library to show you." Ruth handed Cherry the hymnal, 'A Collection of Psalm and Hymn Tunes, Never Published Before by the Reverend Martin Madan'. Cherry handled it carefully, then reflected. "So the loving man who published this hymnal was cast aside because of his pity for the women who came under the bondage of harlotry?* For wanting the men who knew them only as their mistresses to take them as wives? That was his sin? That's not sin, that's a badge of honor! I would love to have known that man!" "Cherry, I think there are some men just like the Reverend Martin Madan who are sitting in this room right now." "I agree. It's wonderful." Cherry looked down. She seemed shy to consider herself one who a Christian might desire. I didn't doubt that she understood her eternal value to the Lord but forgetting her past, let alone believing that any potential husband could forget her past, was still beyond her grasp. Cherry wanted to know more. "So what happened to the Reverend Martin Madan, Ruth?" "After he published Thelyphthora in 1780, he was forced to resign from the London Lock Hospital, the very hospital that he had founded! He'd served thirty four years as its founder and twenty two years as its chaplain when he resigned.35 UPDATE - I have discovered that the Dictionary of National Biography was in error when stating that Madan resigned in 1780. According to various biographies of the time, Madan retained the sole title of Chaplain to the Lock till his death in 1790. Between the years of 1780 and 1790 it is true that other men held the positions of Morning Preacher and Evening Preacher but none filled his position of Chaplain till his death. De Coetlogon and Thomas Scott were the best known of these morning and evening preachers. Ruth handed a Webster's Dictionary to Cherry. "Look up the word, 'Lock hospital.'" "Ok, hang on." Cherry opened the dictionary and read the citation. "'Lock hospital: a hospital for the treatment of venereal diseases.' Wait a minute, Ruth, you're telling me that a new word entered the English language because of the Reverend Martin Madan?" "Yes, Cherry. The Lock Hospital was the first hospital of its kind in the world! Every hospital like it is now referred to as a Lock hospital. To this day, the administrators of such hospitals can only pray that they'll have a fraction of the success that the Reverend Martin Madan had during his years at the Lock." "I'm afraid to know the rest of what happened to the Reverend Martin Madan but I've got to know." "Well Cherry, he was just fifty four years old when he walked out of that noble institution and he died ten years later." Ruth sighed, "Nearly every Christian historian has erased him from their accounts of the great evangelists of the eighteenth century. By their hatred of one man for daring to disagree with their notions of marriage they've erased an important part of England's Church history; the transition from singing Psalms to singing hymns and it was this transition that sparked the great revivals of the hundred years that followed Madan's ministry!" "Now let me get this straight, Ruth. Before Martin Madan promoted the concept, the churches in England didn't sing hymns?" "That's right, Cherry. There were virtually no English churches that sang hymns. They sang Old Testament Psalms set to music. That's much different from today where our hymns combine verses with biblical concepts that call us to repentance or worship. A hymn can be likened to a Bible study set to poetry and music. If one says there's no need for hymns then one must also say there's no need for Bible study leaders or for pastors. The hymn provides a way for biblical concepts to be presented in poetry set to music. Many lost souls that have been deaf to all other forms of preaching have been converted by the hearing of a single hymn." "You really have told me something new today, Ruth!" Cherry broke down in tears. "I'll certainly remember the Reverend Martin Madan the next time I sing a hymn! That precious man. So that man," Cherry was barely able to get out the words through her crying but she managed to complete her thought, "the man who polished some of the most famous words in today's hymnals, the man who arranged the music behind many of those hymns, the man who cared for and counseled those cast aside women of his time, was himself thrown aside; all for the golden calf of monogamy." "Cherry, society will go to any length to continue the bondage of monogamy." Ruth declared, "Men whose wives are their masters can't have God for their master too. They're fornicators; men who put false gods, their wives, in place of our Lord and Savior. Do they do this to defend anything of God? No! They do it to defend their income, their households, and their businesses.36 There, I said it." I hadn't expected to meet such a zealous advocate for polygamy this early in my mission but it was understandable; Ruth's own father had four wives. What was not understandable was how a simple girl who lived atop a mountain in the jungle could have put together such a treasure trove of information about a man I'd hardly known before this day. I too would remember the Reverend Martin Madan but today I was in awe of Ruth. Her discoveries were ground breaking. "What happened to the Reverend Martin Madan is really sad." Asina was sobbing too. "Is that what's going to happen to Sam and Ish? Are their churches going to fire them and will they lose their ministries too?" Now I was perplexed. Today was the first day that I'd even heard women promoting polygamy and Asina was talking as if Sam and I were the force behind their new found plan. John had been quiet up till this moment but now he read from his Bible. "'The righteous are bold as a lion.'37 I can see from your conversation that each of you ladies has the courage of a lion. I have no doubt that you'll follow the word of God as Jesus quoted: 'Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.'38 Notice that the verse says, every word. Tell me, how can we preach repentance if those we're preaching to don't know right from wrong? Does God speak nonsense? Does God speak merely to tickle the ears? No, God speaks and we are to listen to every word, and why listen if we're not to teach what we hear? Wouldn't that be a foolish waste of time? So preaching repentance doesn't mean ignoring everything else in the Bible but it means teaching all of God's word so that those hearing will find at least one word, one precept of God, so that they will see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and be converted, yes, and the Lord will heal them. If by their example our Christian brothers and sisters set rules that are not found in the Bible and we don't correct them, and if our teachers teach the traditions of men and we don't object, won't we by our acquiescence be as guilty as they of laying aside the commandment of God? Won't we have become like those Pharisees accused by Jesus, transgressing the commandment of God by our tradition.39 In fact, won't we be more guilty than those we are called upon to correct by allowing them to stumble. Who are we to say that they won't turn from their sins? 'When a righteous man doth turn from his righteousness, and commit iniquity, and I lay a stumbling block before him,' says the Lord, 'he shall die: because thou hast not given him warning, he shall die in his sin, and his righteousness which he hath done shall not be remembered; but his blood will I require at thine hand.'40 John repeated the words, "At thine hand!" then looked around the room at each of us. "'Nevertheless if thou warn the righteous man, that the righteous sin not, and he doth not sin, he shall surely live, because he is warned; also thou hast delivered thy soul.'41 Ladies, Sam, Ish, we have a duty; a duty to explain what the Bible says on marriage so that those teaching false doctrine can have a choice; the choice to continue in their sin or to repent. If they repent, these ladies will have plenty of husbands to choose from and it will set in motion changes that will easily double the birthrate in Christian households. If the men of the churches don't repent," John paused. A huge smile now dominated his face, "well that will leave all the more women for you to choose from, won't it Ish." John slapped me on the back and chuckled. I was at a loss for the appropriate response so I just kept my mouth shut. John continued, "China still has a one child policy yet the Christian churches here in the Philippines have a no child policy for the millions of believing Christian women who would readily become wives to the already married men in their congregations. These women would have husbands and children except for one thing, tradition, man's tradition. The entire Christian church is in apostasy, apostasy, that's what it is."42 John threw up his hands in disgust and breathed a great sigh. "Sorry, ladies," he apologized, "I've never voiced these words before. I guess I'm getting a bit carried away." Suni countered, "Oh no, John, I'm sure that I'm speaking for all the girls when I say we agree with everything you've just said." "'Yes, yes!" Each of the girls assured him. "I think I've said enough for now, I'll let my daughter take up where she left off about the Reverend Martin Madan." "Thanks Daddy. Well, Martin Madan was a charming man even before he came to know the Lord. He was independently wealthy and had been educated to become an attorney. One night, he was having fun with his friends at a coffee house when they made a challenge to him. Since they knew their friend, Martin Madan, was a great impersonator, just like my daddy." Ruth looked lovingly at her father then continued. "Madan's buddies challenged him to go to one of John Wesley's sermons to study his voice and mannerisms and then come back to entertain them with an impersonation. They thought it would be great fun to see their impersonator extraordinaire imitate the evangelist extraordinaire. Madan took up their challenge. However, upon entering the church he heard John Wesley announcing the sermon he would preach. 'Prepare to meet thy God' and that is in fact what Martin Madan did that night. He then propelled himself into the study of God's word with such vigor that he was soon preaching from the pulpit himself and editing renditions of Charles Wesley's own hymns. Like others who have achieved great fame, the Reverend Martin Madan was no longer called by his name but was known simply as the Counsellor.43 This referred to his ability to present the gospel in the same way that he had presented his cases before a jury. However these jurors were made up of the many truth seekers who attended his grand revivals and it was they who were on trial. Madan effectively presented the case that if they would but plead guilty and throw themselves upon the mercy of the Judge, yea, at the feet of Jehovah Himself, then Jehovah's Own Son, Jesus the Savior, who'd died in their stead, would pardon them.44 In this way, many a juror among those listening was convicted, found guilty, and pardoned. Those who were lost now walked in fellowship with the Lord, forgiven of their sins, cleansed by the blood of Jesus!"45 "Hallelujah!" Cherry shouted, tears streaming down her face. There may be joy in heaven over one sinner who repents but the girls weren't going to wait for heaven. Ruth's story started them rejoicing.46 Suni was now shaking a tambourine and Asina was strumming an autoharp that she'd found among John's family instruments. Ruth handed out some sheets of music and John took his place at the piano. It seemed that the range of emotions my new found friends could experience in a single day was more than I was capable of in a month. I was getting to know each of them so well and yet our entire day had been spent worshipping the Lord through prayer, song, and study. I had not truly known the meaning of the phrase "on fire for the Lord" till this day. The room was like a tinder box that the Holy Ghost had ignited.47 We began to sing from the sheets of music Ruth had handed out. I recognized it as one of the songs Madan had arranged: "Lo He comes with clouds descending Once for favour'd sinners slain Thousand thousand saints attending Swell the triumph of his train Hallelujah, Hallelujah Hallelujah, Hallelujah! Amen!" We sang each stanza through to the last. "Yea, Amen; Let all adore thee High on Thine eternal throne Saviour, take the pow'r and glory Claim the kingdom for Thine own O come quickly Hallelujah, come, Lord, come48 After the hymn the girls continued singing to Jesus. Their sweet voices of praise slowly faded as each of them sang or hummed one more loving note to their Savior. They certainly weren't alone when they sang for they were at one with the Holy Spirit. The glow of a bride on her wedding day shone on their faces as they lifted their hands and looked upward.49 When the girls had finished, Suni was the first to get back to the discussion. "So basically, what we've learned here today is that the man who began the Protestant reformation, putting Bibles into the hands of Christians; Martin Luther, and the man who wrote the greatest Christian poem of all time; John Milton, and the man whose hymns were the first to be sung across the English speaking world; Martin Madan, all taught that polygamy is not only acceptable according to the Bible but that in many cases it is commendable, for it takes care of a man's and a woman's passions within the context of marriage, steering them clear of fornication and making wives of women who would otherwise have no godly outlet. But is it true that our pastors have deliberately set out to deceive us on this issue for fear that telling us the truth would mean an end to their pastoral income!" "Yes!" Sam fell down on his knees, his head bowed in shame. "I'm guilty. I've done this!" Sam looked around the room at each of the girls as he confessed, "I was the leader of a group of pastors who wanted to keep Ish's books out of the schools. Even though Ish's books didn't promote polygamy, his discussion of the subject was too neutral for our liking. We knew that his books might touch off a renewed interest in polygamy that has been dormant in the churches for hundreds of years. All it would take would be one church that practiced polygamy and we'd lose half our members." Asina's face reddened. "So you put your own well being above the well being of your flock!" "Yes, yes. That is, until I prayed that the Lord would guide me on this. The day after my prayer I contacted some other pastors who were all for Ish's books on chastity and we got them into as many schools as we could." Asina quoted a bible passage. "'If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.'50 Of course, we know the Lord has forgiven you Sam, but for what it's worth." Asina's expression turned to gentleness. "I forgive you too." "Me too." The girls were once again teary eyed as each of them let Sam know they held nothing against him. "We can discuss theology all day," I interrupted, "but we have a real life polygamist sitting right next to us. John, isn't it about time we hear your story?" "Story! Story! Story!" The girls started chanting. Their discussion, our praise session, and Sam's confession had done wonders to release their pent up energy and they were back to their cheery selves. "Ok, ok." John was smiling. "But before that, I think it's appropriate that we listen to what Martin Luther himself said concerning the Bible. He said; 'I study the Bible like gathering apples. First I shake the whole tree that the ripest may fall. Then I shake each limb and when I shake each limb I shake each branch and then every twig. Then I look under every leaf. I search the Bible as a whole like shaking the whole tree. Then I shake every limb, book by book. Then I shake every branch giving attention to the chapters. Then I shake every twig by carefully studying the paragraphs and sentences and words and what they mean.' That's exactly how Martin Luther realized that the Bible didn't ban polygamy nor did it punish polygamy.51 We've begun this study using the same methods that Martin Luther used; dealing with what falls from the tree first. We have a lot more to study and I'm so glad that you all will be staying for a few days. It will give us time to meditate on what we learn." Just then, there was a knock at the door. Ruth opened it. Her mother rolled in a cart with several trays of freshly baked goodies, and as always, a fresh pot of mountain grown coffee. "Hi momma. You didn't have to do that. I was just about to get the snacks and coffee myself." "I didn't want my little girl to have to leave her new friends." "Thanks momma." Ruth and her mother hugged. John and his wife looked warmly at each other. You could tell how happy they were that their daughter had finally been able to fellowship with Christian friends. It was clear from her deep knowledge of Christian history and the Bible that she spent endless hours studying alone. "I'll leave you and your friends. Just let me know if you need anything else." "I will momma." Ruth gave her a kiss on the cheek. After she'd left the room, John began his story. "I was born a prince, a young and fortunate prince, a first born prince. As such, I was brought up royal heir to the throne; Prince John, the future king. Spoiled by my mother and her attendants and trained in hunting by my father and my uncles; I was to have both wealth and fame." I expected John's tale to be as rich and full as the coffee I now sipped. The girls warm and simple smiles reminded me of Mary when we first met; full of hope and love for the Lord. There is no woman more beautiful than one on fire for the Lord and here I was surrounded by the most dazzling women on earth. I prayed quietly that the Lord would guide their steps, and mine. *Harlot - a woman who has engaged in sexual relations without the benefit of marriage. Harlots are in bondage to sin, in bondage to the men they have relations with and those men are also in bondage to them. [Do you like what you just read? Click Here to Send this to a friend.] Click Here to Go to Rites of Manhood - The Prince of Sumba - Chapter 13 Footnotes: 22 22 - more 22 - more22-26 27-31 32-38 39-48 49-52
Walter C. Kaiser's Hateful Slander Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:05:47 -0600 Walter C. Kaiser's Hateful Slander of King David Walter C. Kaiser Jr. claims in "Hard Sayings of the Bible (1997, c1996) Downers Grove, Il: InterVarsity." that since God never gave permission for polygamy then King David sinned by taking more than one wife. Here is what Mr. Kaiser states: "No permission can be recited from the text for any such institution or practice." Kaiser, W. C. (1997, c1996). Hard sayings of the Bible (223). Downers Grove, Il: InterVarsity. Mr. Kaiser thinks you and I are too stupid to know that he has changed the definition of sin in order to slander King David. He has changed the definition of sin to: That which is not expressly permitted. [false definition of sin] Does Mr. Kaiser, a man, have the right to change the definition of sin? The real definition of sin is: That which is expressly forbidden. [correct definition of sin] Specifically: To disobey a command of God to do something. To disobey a command of God not to do something. There is no other thing that can be called sin and Mr. Kaiser knows this. Let me repeat, Mr. Kaiser KNOWS the definition of sin. So for what purpose has Mr. Kaiser decided to redefine sin? He has redefined sin in order to create a "straw man." A "straw man" is an imaginary opposition argument that has been created only for the purpose of easily knocking it down, thus the name, "straw man." Let's look at how ridiculous Mr. Kaiser's definition is. According to Mr. Kaiser's own definition of sin, the following things are sinful because the Bible does not expressly permit them: Marrying a woman who has hazel eyes. Marrying a woman who has a middle name. Marrying a woman who wears long underwear. You can see that according to Mr. Kaiser's own definition of sin, it is a sin to marry at all because unless your specific case is expressly permitted, it's a sin. Mr. Kaiser should put his tail between his legs and repent. He knows that he has played a trick to make his point. The trickery he has used is so well known that as I've pointed out, it has a name, "straw man." Walter C. Kaiser's Hateful Slander of Jacob Walter C. Kaiser continues his slander against the Jews in his section about Jacob. He stoops once again to straw man trickery, stating: "Polygamy was never lawful for any of the persons in the Bible. There never existed an express biblical permission for such a deviation from the ordinance of God made at the institution of marriage in the Garden of Eden (Gen 2:21-24)." Kaiser, W. C. (1997, c1996). Hard sayings of the Bible (130). Downers Grove, Il: InterVarsity. Now remember, nothing requires "an express biblical permission." Sin is that which is forbidden to do as well as that which is forbidden not to do. So what is this "ordinance of God made at the institution of marriage in the Garden of Eden" that Kaiser talks about? Mr. Kaiser wants us to believe that there is some ordinance in the verses he mentions that forbids polygamy but that is not what the verses are about. If Mr. Kaiser had analyzed the Hebrew grammar he would have known that. Hebrew, or any language for that matter, is not made up merely of words to be translated although some armchair theologians would like to think so. To understand any sentence, we must analyze not only the words but the grammar, the syntax, and more. Here are the verses that Kaiser brings up. Genesis 2:21-24 21 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; 22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. 23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. 24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh. Now let's remember, sin is that which is forbidden [forbidden to do or forbidden not to do.] What does Genesis 2:24 forbid? Genesis 2:24 forbids homosexuality [leave his father] and it forbids mother son incest [leave his mother.] What does Genesis 2:24 command? Genesis 2:24 commands heterosexual sex. The reason for this understanding of Genesis 2:24 is explained in the sentence structure. According to the AFPMA [Anderson-Forbes Phrase Marker Analysis,] the sentence in Genesis 2:24 is divided into two unit phrases: "Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife." "and they shall become one flesh." Italicizing the word they reveals the Hebrew meaning. "and they shall become one flesh." In other words, they shall become one flesh as opposed to the man becoming one flesh with his father or with his mother. Look how the sentence reads with that understanding. Paraphrase: The reason that a man shall leave his father and his mother and cleave unto his wife is that it is they [the man and his wife] who are to be as one flesh [and certainly the man and his father are not to be as one flesh nor are the man and his mother to be as one flesh.] Consider this; the word translated here as "leave" is translated nearly twice as much as "forsake." Now let's read the sentence with forsake instead of leave. "Therefore shall a man forsake his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife." Does it say forsake all others? No, it doesn't. It says forsake his father [ban on male homosexuality] and forsake his mother [ban on mother son incest.] Our God is a righteous God. When God condemned Sodom and Gomorrah with destruction, its people had already broken many laws that were well known to them; laws which were well known to Adam and which he passed down to his descendents. One of the laws that the men of Sodom and Gomorrah broke was the law against male homosexuality which is found in Genesis 2:24 and is found nowhere else in scripture prior to the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. We know that the men of Sodom and Gomorrah knew that their homosexuality was a sin precisely because of the account of Genesis 2:24. Adam kept at least an oral record of Genesis 2:24 which was eventually written by Moses. Here is a list of some other laws that the descendents of Adam would have received from Adam. Sanctification of the Sabbath. Genesis 2:3 Ban on male homosexuality. Genesis 2:24 Ban on mother son incest. Genesis 2:24 The requirement for blood sacrifice. Genesis 3:21, Genesis 4:5 The value of repentance. Genesis 4:7 (salvation by grace) Ban on murder. Genesis 4:8 Paul encapsulates well the lesson of Genesis 3:21, Genesis 4:5, and Genesis 4:7 when he writes in his letter to the Hebrews, chapter 9 verse 22 "And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission." Mr. Kaiser is left with the fact that the Bible contains no law against polygamy. For those of you who want to use "law of the land" arguments against polygamy, remember; if you argue that polygamy is wrong because it's against the law then you must also argue that George Washington was a traitor and should have been hanged and that the United States is in rebellion against Great Britain and must go back to being a colony. How much hatred must Mr. Kaiser have in his heart that he feels the need to use trickery instead of God's word to make his case. Jesus was clear that slander involves hatred. Matthew 5:22 But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Racac, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire. Walter C. Kaiser's Hateful Slander of Righteous Abraham Mr. Kaiser is not satisfied in having slandered the patriarch of the Jews, Jacob, nor is slandering David, the great writer of the Psalms enough, but he feels impelled to slander righteous Abraham by referring to his marriage with Hagar as cohabitation! Read for yourself: "While the Bible does not stop to moralize on Abram's cohabitation with Hagar, it nevertheless expects each reader to realize that what was taking place was contrary to the will and morality that God approved." Kaiser, W. C. (1997, c1996). Hard sayings of the Bible (122). Downers Grove, Il: InterVarsity. Notice that Mr. Kaiser has to rely on cultural bigotry to get across his point, stating that, "The Bible ... expects each reader to realize that what was taking place was contrary to the will and morality that God approved." Mr. Kaiser, the Lord expects us to "realize" no such thing. In fact, the Lord commands us through the Bible: Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. Proverbs 3:5 The foolishness of man perverteth his way: and his heart fretteth against the LORD. Proverbs 19:3 Do you believe it, Mr. Kaiser? Is man's heart so naturally foolish that it rebels against what the Lord teaches? If you believe Proverbs 19:3 and Proverbs 3:5 then why do you ask men to "realize" i.e., to "lean unto their own understanding?" In closing, Mr. Kaiser, who do you think you are? How is it that you are so much greater than the Bible that you can invent new definitions of sin? Is your straw man a nifty little trick that you pull because you enjoy seeing stupid people in awe? Well, it's not so nifty and people aren't so stupid. Compare yourself with the men you condemn: Jacob who God Himself gave the name Israel after having wrestled with God! Jacob raised twelve sons from which the nation of Israel and our Lord and Savior, Jesus, trace their roots. King David wrote the Psalms! Abraham was called the Friend of God!!! And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God. James 2:23 Please pray with me for Mr. Kaiser. Pray that Mr. Kaiser will "lean not unto his own understanding" but will lean unto "every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God." Matthew 4:4b Pray also that he will correct his books and publicly confess that he has sinned by using the trickery of the straw man.
Romans 6:1,2,18 What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein? Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness. We Preach Real Grace on this Website, not "greasy grace." Excerpts from Articles on this site About God's Great Grace From Chapter 24 - Isa's Story Where was the light? Where was my faith? What was I seeing? Was I blind? I saw the priest go back into rooms with those boys. I heard the sounds. Of course I lied. I was protecting the holiness of the priesthood. Too bad they believed the other witnesses and not me or the priest would still have his holy robes and the church would be protected from those born agains! I remembered the man whose shouts had summoned me from beneath the bench. That was holiness. What a strange thing. He prayed to be clean and he was made clean. The song continued. "Was it for crimes that I had done, he groaned upon the tree? Amazing pity, grace unknown, and love beyond degree!" Like the shower spraying above me my eyes burst with tears. I sobbed. The crime! I had tried to protect the guilty while condemning those poor molested boys as liars. Praise God they had not listened to me or the other women in the church who had tried to protect that ungodly priest. "Praise God!" That came from my mouth? I realized I was talking outloud or was I praying. The song continued. "Well might the sun in darkness hide and shut his glories in when Christ, the mighty Maker died for man the creature's sin. Thus might I hide my blushing face while His dear cross appears dissolve my heart in thankfulness, and melt my eyes to tears. "Thank You Jesus!" I began shouting, "Thank You Jesus!" Who am I now? I thought to myself then just as suddenly I shouted. "Praise God!" Who am I? I'm born again! There was no shame, no second thoughts. I was simply changed, in an instant. Sure, you'll find out that I have worldy things about me that I don't seem to be able to shake but the Lord keeps me clean and keeps me from temptations that I cannot resist. The song finished as I dried off. "But drops of grief can ne'er repay the debt of love I owe: Here, Lord, I give my self away 'Tis all that I can do." I had never felt that I belonged to anyone but now I felt I had a Master; the Lord Jesus. A burden had truly been lifted from me. Such a change to occur by listening to a song. Read all of Chapter 24 - Isa's Story - Click Here From "John and Charles Wesley's Sister Married a Polygamist Another occasion that showed Westley Hall's gracious manner was "when Whitefield and [John] Wesley quarreled respecting the doctrine of 'Free Grace,' and Whitefield declared his intention to attack Wesley and his brother [Charles] wherever he went, Westley Hall assumed the office of peacemaker, waited upon Whitefield, and reminded him of a promise, he had made, 'that whatever his private opinion was, he would never publicly preach against' them."7 Here is what Susanna Wesley wrote concerning the Reverend Westley Hall and his wife Martha Wesley Hall in a letter dated August 5, 1737: "Mr. Hall and his wife are very good to me. He behaves like a gentleman and a Christian; and my daughter with as much duty and tenderness as can be expressed."8 A little over two years later, on September 3, 1739, John Wesley wrote in his journal: "I talked largely with my mother, who told me, that, till a short time since, she had scarce heard such a thing mentioned as the having God's spirit bearing witness with our spirit: much less did she imagine that this was the common privilege of all true believers. 'Therefore,' said she, 'I never durst ask for it myself. But two or three weeks ago, while my son Hall was pronouncing those words, in delivering the cup to me, -The blood of our Lord Jesus Christ, which was given for thee,-the words struck my heart, and I knew, God, for Christ's sake, had forgiven me all my sins.'" Read: John and Charles Wesley's Sister Married a Polygamist - Click Here From Thelyphthora - Read it for FREE! Martin Madan also wrote the words to "Now Begin the Heav'nly Theme" which is more often known by the name "Redeeming love" and which was clearly inspired by his charitable ministry to those who had escaped the bonds of prostitution. Listen to how his lyrics appeal to the lost, that they would accept God's grace and "taste redeeming love." 'Ye, alas! who long have been Willing slaves to death and sin, Now from bliss no longer rove, Stop and taste redeeming love.'" Read Article: Thelyphthora - Read it for FREE! - Click Here From Charles Wesley's Son was a Polygamist Now this powerful conversion of Martin Madan was no exaggeration for he was so interested in reaching the lost for the Lord that he took the chaplaincy of the London Lock Hospital, a hospital that treated those afflicted with venereal diseases. He knew that
